Changing an Outdated Educational Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Changing an Outdated Educational Policy - Essay Example The policies set to guide the transfer of technological practices in schools have not been a success. The old educational policies in technology have put computers in schools, however, the system itself is not adequate enough to accommodate the transition from old practices to the new practices. This paper outlines the weakness of the outdated use of internet in schools and recommendations to embrace k-12 education policy in the school systems. Schools have different technology education policies. However, they all have a similarity as the government gives the general policies to be in use, in the respective schools. In Pender County schools, there is a restriction in the use of computers and internet (Student technology policies, 2004). The school policy is that the student will only use the school internet only during the beginning ten days after schools open. This is only after they are aware of the policies set by Board in charge of education (Student technology policies, 2004). A students use of the school can be stopped if he does not sign the technology use policy available in the first ten days. The parents, too, can stop a students use of internet in school. The parent has a right to raise a complaint to the administration that could lead to the students’ ban from use of the internet while in school (Student technology policies, 2004). According to the policy, all the information retrieved from the internet is a property of the school in question. This includes all the emails and internet downloaded information that any student or other staff members may have. The school system has a right to retain the data for a period of three years and even longer if it is business related. As such, it would be difficult to allow privacy in the use and running of the internet in school. The students and employees can be allowed to have hard copies of the data that they may be in need of

American Constitution Law 3 J Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

American Constitution Law 3 J - Essay Example The clause is there to protect accused persons or alleged perpetrators from abuse in a number of ways, namely; from a second trial for the same offence after prosecution, acquittal, and against multiple punishments (Stephens & Scheb, 2008). In Johnson’s case, he was already tried and found innocent of the purported crime. The clause also dictates that defendants cannot be tried for a lesser crime within the original crime (Stephens & Scheb, 2008). This means that any crime that is seen to be lesser in nature to the original crime, but is merged within the murder, cannot be used to try and convict Johnson in a court of law. Johnson has a right to cite the Double Jeopardy Article in the event you decide to take him to court over the same crime. I think it may be worthwhile mentioning that there are some instances where the rule may not apply, for instance; if multiple offenses were carried out by Johnson, the clause does not apply to him. He could be tried for the other offenses he committed that may carry the same sentence or conviction as the murder of your family member. Unfortunately, this case may not be used to talk of the defendant’s conduct. There is also a reason why this testimony may not be enough to let Johnson go to court. The court would want to maintain the integrity and finality of all criminal proceedings. If the court were to summarily ignore the unsatisfactory outcomes of your case against Johnson, then its integrity would be called to question. This Clause is considered as one of the oldest concepts, and cannot easily be altered as people have tried over the years (Stephens & Scheb, 2008). In spite of the testimony provided by Johnson’s brother on his deathbed, it may not be sufficient to ask for a retrial of Johnson’s case. His Miranda rights did not apply at the time of the confession because it is a belief that anything said at that time is acceptable in court. He can be tried and found guilty of the